Estonian Civil Society Concept
Estonian Civil Society Concept (EKAK in Estonian as an abbreviation from Eesti Kodanikuühiskonna
Arengukontseptsioon) was initiated by NENO in 1999 with financial support from UNDP. The document was rewritten three times before EKAK was approved by Estonian Nonprofit Roundtable (an open forum for all nonprofits in Estonia that was active from 2000-04) in 2001 and handed over to the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Long process allowed participation of hundreds of NGOs – the project managers toured the country, met with NGOs at public roundtables and drew up bulky charts of amendments and proposals from people living in the remotest villages –, and the feeling of ’ownership’ of NGO community over EKAK, thus making it a truly legitimate voice of the NGOs and not just a creation of one umbrella organisation. Moreover, writing the document and later seeing it adopted by Riigikogu certainly gave the Estonian NGO community a boost of self-esteem and self-recognition as a united force in society.
Parallel to the discussions within NGO community, the political parties were involved in the process in its development phase. Although it took more than a year before EKAK was adopted by the Riigikogu in December 2002, the delay was caused more by confusion which parliamentary commission should work with it (finally it was done in joint operation of culture, social and constitutional commissions), not by the reluctance of politicians. Finally, EKAK was adopted unanimously by all political parties represented in the Riigikogu. However, looking back to the process, it can be said that the it should have involved also ministries, because it was their mediocre awareness and interest in EKAK that later turned out to be the weakest link of its implementation.
EKAK is the strategy document, that defines the mutually complementing roles of public authorities and civic initiative, principles of their cooperation and mechanisms and priorities for cooperation in shaping and implementing public policies and building up civil society in Estonia. Besides concrete goals and fields of activities (e.g. improvement of the system of financing citizens’ associations from public budget, systematisation of the statistics about third sector, development of the principles for public participation in the policy-making and for outsourcing public services to the nonprofit sector, etc) perhaps the mostimportant underlying conception of this document is that both the public and the nonprofit sector are equal partners in developing the society, and that nonprofit sector remains independent even if it receives funding from public sector. Although it is likely that most of politicians at that time saw it just as a declaration, the fact that it was adopted by the parliament has been very useful for NGO community as since then it has been possible to refer to this document whenever there are problems with public and nonprofit sectors’ cooperation.
In every two years (so far in 2005 and 2007) the parliamentary hearing takes place on EKAK implementation.
A Joint Committee for EKAK implementation was established in 2003 composed of representatives of each ministry and NGOs from different fields. Among other things, the Committee was assigned to evaluate the degree to which the parties have fulfilled the commitments they undertook in the EKAK, as well as to develop an activity plan for the years 2004-06.
There were three working groups established within the Committee: one dealing with legislation and involvement issues, second with sustainability of the nonprofit sector, and third with civic education.
At the end of 2006, NENO conducted an audit for the Joint Committee that identified three main problems in implementing EKAK: (1) lack of political interest; (2) poor quality and implementation of activity plan caused by insufficient financial and human resources (the budget for the Committee was allocated from a supplementary budget of approx. 130 000-190 000 Euros a year), and (3) unclear role and responsibilities of both the Committee and its members, especially from the side of public sector (the ministries were represented by officials who usually didn’t have the power to make decisions in the name of their ministry). Due to the lack of government funding the NGOs represented in the Committee had to find the resources often on their own if they wanted the work to get done (e.g. many activities were funded by Baltic-American Partnership Programme). Furthermore, because of the limited resources the working groups within the Commitee had to fulfill two contradictory roles, being at the same time responsible for implementation of the activity plan and evaluating the implementation. In the years following the estabilishment of the Committee its membership increased to 30, which also slowed down the efficiency of the work.
In order to solve these problems, NGOs recommended the revision of the principles and membership of the Joint Committee and formation of implementation units in both the public sector and NGOs. During the summer of 2007, the principles and membership of the Committee were revised, and as a result the new committee is smaller in number, but composed of higher level officials. It includes representatives of 10 umbrella organizations, business and trade unions, as well as chancellors (the highest state officials in Estonia) of the ministries of Finance, Social Affairs, Education, Culture, and Economic Affairs, and the deputy-chancellor of the Ministry of Interior. The Minister of Regional Affairs chairs the Committee. In addition, a representative of the Estonian Parliament and two government foundations (Enterprise Estonia and Non-Estonians’ Integration Foundation) also sit on this Committee.
As about implementation units, a positive development has been the employment of additional two officials within the Ministry of Interior, under Minister of Regional Affairs, who are responsible for civil society development (from 2003-07 there was only one official working with these issues). The ministry plans to establish a department for civil society development that would act as the implementation unit of EKAK on behalf of public sector. Nevertheless, NGOs are also pushing for the formation of implementation unit on behalf of nonprofit sector, financed by the state budget. Although the need for such an unit was also supported by the chair of civil society support group in the Riigikogu, the negotiations are still ongoing without any signs of success so far.
The problems with the lack of units responsible for the implementation of EKAK became clear in the process of putting together the Civic Initiative Support Development Plan, known as KATA in Estonian.
KATA aims to replace the activity plan for implementing EKAK from 2007. Essentially it is a document that brings together information about all the activities from the development plans of the various ministries that are connected with civil society. The main problem however is that KATA does not perceive civil society as a whole (as EKAK does) but as a sum of specific activities particular to one sector. Therefore its focus is not on the cross-sectoral issues, e.g. sustainability of NGOs. Further, NGO participation in the development of KATA is also limited, because of the fact that it relies predominantly on the ministries’ development plans.
The above provides a rather critical view of the EKAK implementation, with perhaps too much emphasis on the flaws of the system. As the initiators and as one of the leaders of implementation processes on behalf of NGO sector, we felt it is important to share these learning points in order to help prevent the same mistakes in the case of similar cooperation documents being launched in future in other countries. Doubtlessly, EKAK has initiated important steps in the development of the civil society in Estonia. Strategic approach has allowed both the public and nonprofit sector to recognise the value of a strong civil society. Based on that strategy (i.e. to do the right things), several guidelines and processes have been developed to achieve this vision (i.e. to do things rightly). Most important among them have been: